Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 96 Download : 148

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pandemi Covid 19 telah memberikan dampak yang signifikan terhadap revolusi dunia pendidikan. Perubahan yang massif terjadi pada dunia pendidikan dengan peralihan pembelajaran tatap muka ke dalam pembelajaran online sebagai upaya pencegahan penyebaran infeksi Covid 19. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor yang terbentuk pada instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran online berbasis Community of Inquiry (CoI) selama masa Pandemi Covid 19. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian expost facto dengan jenis deskriptif eksploratif kuantitatif. Data yang digunakan merupakan data yang diperoleh secara riil dengan kategori data sekunder. Data diunduh melalui laman http://data.mendeley.com yang telah diunggah oleh kontributor Simon Wong dari Divisi Ilmu Pengetahuan, Teknik dan Studi Kesehatan, Sekolah Tinggi Profesi dan Berkelanjutan Pendidikan, Universitas Politeknik Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Cina. Responden yang berpartisipasi dalam penelitian merupakan mahasiswa D3 Ilmu Teknik dan Bisnis sebanyak 212 orang. Data dianalisis menggunakan Program R notebook. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan analisis faktor eksploratori terdapat 3 faktor yang mendasari penyusunan validitas kontruk instrument yaitu partisipasi kognitif, partisipasi social, dan partisipasi pengajar. 

Keywords

Analisis Faktor Eksploratori Community of Inquiry (CoI) validitas konstruk instrumen Pembelajaran Online Pandemi Covid 19

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kusuma, M., Arfiani, Y., & Hayati, M. N. (2020). Pembelajaran Online berbasis Community of Inquiry (CoI) di masa Pandemi Covid-19 : Studi Analisis Faktor Eksploratori. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 5(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v5i2.178

References

  1. Watkins, M.COI. (2018), “Exploratory factor analysis: a guide to best practice”, Journal of Black Psychology, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 219-246.
  2. Wong, Simon (2020), “Survey Data of Students' Community of Inquiry Adjustments”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/s2h69tyg2k.1
  3. Cai, R., & Wang, Q. (2020). A six-step online teaching method based on protocol-guided learning during the COVID-19 epidemic: A case study of the first middle school teaching practice in changyuan City,Henan province, China. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.rp010
  4. Xia, J. (2020). Practical exploration of school-family cooperative education during the COVID-19 epidemic: A case study of zhenjiang experimental school in jiangsu province, China. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 521–528. https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.3555523
  5. Zhang, COI., et al. (2020). Suspending ClassesWithout stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the covid-19 breakout. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055
  6. Zhou, L., et al. (2020). School’s out, but Class’s on, the largest online education in the world today: Taking China’s practical exploration during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555520\
  7. Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45-58.
  8. Wood, R., and Shirazi, S. (2020). A systematic review of audience response systemsfor teaching and learning in higher education: the student experience. Comp. Educ. 153:103896. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103896
  9. Yu, F. COI., and Wu, C. P. (2011). Different identity revelation modes in an online peer-assessment learning environment: effects on perceptions toward assessors, classroom climate and learning activities. Comp. Educ. 57, 2167–2177. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.012
  10. Lee, COI. C. (2008). The role of perceived resources in online learning adoption. Comput. Educ. 50, 1423–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.001
  11. Pratiwi, E. R., Wonorahardjo, S., & Arief, M. (2016). Partisipasi Online Dalam Pembelajaran Community Of Inquiry (CoI) Pada Materi Distilasi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(7), 1410-1416.
  12. Kirana, N. C., Anggraeni, S., & Diana, S. (2021). Pengaruh penerapan community of inquiry menggunakan LINE terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa SMA pada materi energi terbarukan. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 4(1), 24-31.
  13. Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. 2010. Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education. 32(3): 349—377
  14. Garrison, D. R. & Vaughan, N. 2008. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: Willey.
  15. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  16. George, D. (2011), SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference, 17.0 update, Pearson Education India, New Delhi.
  17. Lau, Y. Y., Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Vyas, L., Sandoval-Hernandez, A., & Wong, S. (2021). COVID-19 crisis: exploring community of inquiry in online learning for sub-degree students. Frontiers in Psychology, 2842.
  18. Ngai, E. W. T., Lai, K. H., and Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Logistics information systems: The Hong Kong experience. Int. J. Product. Econ. 113, 223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.05.018
  19. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. and Tatham, R. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  20. Bonett, D.G. and Wright, T.A. (2015), “Cronbach’s alpha reliability: interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 3-15.